|
|
|
ÀÌÀ±Áø ( Lee Yun-Jin ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø °£È£±¹
¹Ú½Â¹Ì ( Park Seung-Mi ) - È£¼´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú ±èÁ¤À± ( Kim Jung-Yoon ) - ºÐ´ç¼¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¼ºÇü¿Ü°ú ±èö±Ô ( Kim Chul-Gyu ) - ûÁÖ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú Â÷¼±°æ ( Cha Sung-Kyung ) - ûÁÖ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This study was done to compare clinical nurses¡¯ knowledge and visual differentiation diagnostic ability for the pressure ulcer classification system (PUCS) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD).
Methods: A convenience sample of 602 nurses took the pressure ulcer classification system and incontinence-associated dermatitis knowledge test (PUCS & IAD KT) and completed the visual differentiation tool (VDT), consisting of 21 photographs with clinical information.
Results: The overall mean score for correct answers was 14.5 (¡¾3.2) in PUCS & IAD KT and 11.15 (¡¾4.9) in PUCS & IAD VDT. Incorrect responses were most common for statements related to stage III, IAD for PUCS & IAD KT, and suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI), unstageable, and stage III for PUCS & IAD VDT. Significant correlations were found between PUCS & IAD KT and VDT (r=.48, p<.001). Factors affecting scores for PUCS & IAD VDT were PUCS & IAD KT, frequency of pressure ulcer, IAD management and participation in wound care education programs.
Conclusion: Results indicate that nurses have an overall understanding of PUCS & IAD, but low visual differentiation ability regarding stage III, SDTI, and unstageable ulcers. Continuing education is needed to further improve knowledge and visual differentiation ability for PUCS & IAD.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
Pressure ulcer, Nurses, Knowledge, Dermatitis
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|